Companies · Software / Tech
Oakland · Software / Tech · refined from filed group “Other Technology”
Diligence memoA one-page analyst read on Hound Labs, Inc. — recommendation, valuation, rhythm, risks.→Hound Labs, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page. Valuation uses the technology sector profile.
Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.
No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.
Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.
Hound Labs, Inc. is one of 3920 Software / Tech companies tracked from Oakland. By capital raised it ranks among the largest (ahead of 90% of sector peers), and among the largest by modeled valuation est..
Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.
As reported in public records reported — not modeled.
Solid bars are reported offering amounts reported; hatched bars are the modeled post-money valuation est. — both on one shared scale so you can read raise-vs-worth at each round directly. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.
The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.
Stages are modeled from round size (public records carry no series label). No record for: Pre-Seed — the company may have raised it under a different exemption, merged it into an adjacent record, or skipped it. Sequence completeness: 75%.
Round size and date are reported; the stage label is inferred from round size (latest is Series B — a $15M–$40M round). Valuation is modeled from stage benchmarks scaled by the technology sector profile. Directional, not a quoted figure.
Benchmarked against 3920 companies in Software / Tech. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.
Raised more than 90% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 95% of peers (estimate).
A tighter cohort than the sector chart above — only companies at the same stage (Series B) that last raised in the same ~3-year era, ranked by modeled value est. (not money raised). This is the exact set the analyst read compares against, so a like-for-like cohort is what makes "over/under-valued" meaningful. This company ranks #11 of 142.
| Company | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | vs peer med. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trackonomy Systems, Inc. | Series B | $49.2M | $1.2B | 2.17× |
| Tray.IO Inc. | Series B | $59.3M | $1.1B | 2.07× |
| Unravel Data Systems, Inc. | Series B | $56.2M | $1.1B | 1.95× |
| Salus Labs, Inc. | Series B | $35.0M | $1.1B | 1.95× |
| Anchor Labs, Inc. | Series B | $33.7M | $1.0B | 1.88× |
| Compound Labs, Inc. | Series B | $41.8M | $1.0B | 1.85× |
| Mode Analytics, Inc. | Series B | $72.3M | $995.9M | 1.83× |
| Cleo Labs, Inc | Series B | $84.7M | $957.4M | 1.76× |
| Bevy Labs, Inc. | Series B | $55.0M | $955.6M | 1.75× |
| Temperpack Technologies Inc. | Series B | $79.9M | $939.5M | 1.72× |
| Hound Labs, Inc. this company | Series B | $49.2M | $933.0M | 1.71× |
| Cloud Elements, Inc. | Series B | $60.2M | $913.7M | 1.68× |
Stage is inferred from round size est., not reported on the filing — a round's dollar size maps to a bucket: Pre-Seed <$1.0M · Seed $1.0M–$4.0M · Series A $4.0M–$15M · Series B $15M–$40M · Series C $40M–$100M · Series D+ $100M–$400M · Growth/Late >$400M.
| Stage | Amount · real | Announced | Post-money · est | Value · est | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed | $1.7M | 2015-11-30 | $8.6M | $58.4M | 85% |
| Seed | $2.4M | 2017-03-07 | $12.0M | $81.7M | 90% |
| Series A | $8.1M | 2017-05-12 | $36.8M | $224.5M | 90% |
| Series A | $7.7M | 2021-01-13 | $34.8M | $170.7M | 90% |
| Series B | $37.0M | 2021-01-13 | $205.6M | $933.0M | 90% |
| Series B | $29.1M | 2021-01-13 | $161.9M | $734.7M | 90% |
Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.
Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.
Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.
| Person | Role | Also runs | Tied since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitch Lasky | — | 8 other | 2017-05 |
| Richard Wolf | — | 5 other | 2017-05 |
| Thomas Mawhinney | — | 4 other | 2021-01 |
| Dov Szapiro | — | 2 other | 2021-01 |
| Michael Lynn | — | 2 other | 2015-11 |
| Naozer Dadachanji | — | 1 other | 2015-11 |
| William McComb | — | 1 other | 2021-01 |
| John Lindgren | — | — | 2021-01 |
| Marc Jones | — | — | 2015-11 |
| Rami Karijian | — | — | 2017-03 |
Hound Labs, Inc. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.
Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | Why similar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trackonomy Systems, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $49.2M | $1.2B | same sector · same stage |
| Vanilla Technologies Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $49.3M | $496.3M | same sector · same stage |
| Igneous Systems, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $49.7M | $788.0M | same sector · same stage |
| Make Cents Technologies Inc | Software / Tech | Series B | $48.7M | $336.0M | same sector · same stage |
| Unifi Software, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $48.6M | $520.0M | same sector · same stage |
| Stream.io, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $49.9M | $738.7M | same sector · same stage |
| Cista System Corp. | Software / Tech | Series B | $48.5M | $537.5M | same sector · same stage |
| Descartes Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $50.0M | $609.1M | same sector · same stage |
Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Value · est | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hound Technology, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series C | $683.1M | 96% |
| Hash Labs Inc. | Software / Tech | Series A | $164.4M | 86% |
| Barking Labs Corp. | Software / Tech | Series B | $727.5M | 86% |
| Theta Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $887.6M | 85% |
| HS Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Pre-Seed | $19.0M | 85% |
| Bark Technologies, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series A | $278.4M | 85% |
| STYR Labs Inc. | Software / Tech | Series A | $138.7M | 85% |
| Rune Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $60.0M | 85% |
See where Hound Labs, Inc. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.
If you work at Hound Labs, Inc., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.
Is this your company? Update your profile or add contact details — and choose exactly who can reach you. Reviewed before anything is published.