Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026
Hockey Parent Holdings, L.P.
Hockey Parent Holdings, L.P. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Hockey Parent Holdings, L.P. operates in Other, based in CHICAGO.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Hockey Parent Holdings, L.P. has raised $391M in disclosed capital across 41 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).
Largest single filing: $62M on 2021-02-05.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2026-03-01.
Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Hockey Parent Holdings, L.P. at approximately $9.2M (range $6.4M–$11M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.03× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2025–2027 (76 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 2 months.
Last raise 4 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.
The last round was 10.4× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 99% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 37% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Premium Packaged Products LLC, Hoagie Investor Holdings, LLC, Sunset At El Paso Llc, Orion Street Capital LLC, Mozella Capital Inc..
Peoplefiled
24 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.
Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.