Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

HiiDef, LLC

HiiDef, LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

HiiDef, LLC operates in Other, based in AVENTURA.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

HiiDef, LLC has raised $9.1M in disclosed capital across 5 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $3.7M on 2010-08-31.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2011-08-31.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models HiiDef, LLC at approximately $42M (range $2.0M–$328M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.24× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2010–2012 (877 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (124% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 3 months.

Last raise 14.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 1.2× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 76% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 68% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Carsmetics Socal Group, Llc, Hot Flashes, LLC, Watermill-MPI Partners, L.P., Insituform Technologies Inc, Aquantis, Inc..

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.