Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
HDT International Holdings, Inc.
HDT International Holdings, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
HDT International Holdings, Inc. operates in Other, based in Solon.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
HDT International Holdings, Inc. has raised $20M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).
Largest single filing: $11M on 2010-02-16.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2010-02-16.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models HDT International Holdings, Inc. at approximately $160M (range $14M–$872M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.77× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2010–2012 (632 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 1 months.
Last raise 16.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round stepped up 1.1× from the prior — scaling.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 86% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 87% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Worldview Entertainment Capital Llc, Applied Merchant Systems West Coast, Inc., SWMF Life Science Venture Fund, Limited Partnership, PrimaLoft Holding Company, LLC, Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc..
Peoplefiled
12 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.