Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Hayden AI Technologies Inc.

Hayden AI Technologies Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Hayden AI Technologies Inc. operates in AI / ML, based in San Francisco.

Sub-sector tags: ai/ml.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Hayden AI Technologies Inc. has raised $96M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $95M on 2024-07-03.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2024-07-03.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Hayden AI Technologies Inc. at approximately $968M (range $360M–$1.5B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.66× the median modeled value of Series C AI / ML companies in 2022–2024 (18 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 48 months.

Last raise 24 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round stepped up 146.2× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 97% of AI / ML peers (2067 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 98% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Stability Ai, Inc., Runway AI Inc., Fathom, Inc., Protect AI, Inc., Reka AI, Inc..

Peoplefiled

6 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.