Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Harvest One Capital Inc.

Harvest One Capital Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Harvest One Capital Inc. operates in Other, based in VANCOUVER.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Harvest One Capital Inc. has raised $758K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $758K on 2017-02-22.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2017-02-22.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Harvest One Capital Inc. at approximately $18M (range $505K–$199M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.17× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2016–2018 (1548 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports no revenue, yet is modeled well above niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 9.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 31% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 50% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Castleray Mezzanine Partners I, LLC, AFI Holdings, LLC, WWGL Inc., Ride Velo, Inc., ChampAmerica Inc..

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.