Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Hale & Associates Automotive Holdings, Inc.
Hale & Associates Automotive Holdings, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Hale & Associates Automotive Holdings, Inc. operates in Other, based in COSTA MESA.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Hale & Associates Automotive Holdings, Inc. has raised $2.4M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).
Largest single filing: $2.0M on —.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-06-29.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Hale & Associates Automotive Holdings, Inc. at approximately $9.1M (range $263K–$104M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.28× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 546 months.
Last raise 11.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round was 5.1× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 52% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 36% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.
Peoplefiled
1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.