Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 1, 2026

Halcyon Sailing, LLC

Halcyon Sailing, LLC looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Halcyon Sailing, LLC operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Halcyon Sailing, LLC has raised $700K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $700K on 2013-01-08.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-01-08.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Halcyon Sailing, LLC at approximately $16M (range $467K–$183M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.00× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (1650 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 13.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 30% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 48% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Produce P&A Fund, LLC, Tempus Applied Solutions Holdings, Inc., Music Labs, Inc., SAL Ethika Investments, LLC, Vyance, Inc..

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.