Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Griffith Laboratories International, Inc.
Griffith Laboratories International, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Griffith Laboratories International, Inc. operates in Other, based in ALSIP.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Griffith Laboratories International, Inc. has raised $60M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).
Largest single filing: $45M on 2014-01-15.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-11-14.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Griffith Laboratories International, Inc. at approximately $257M (range $58M–$678M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.30× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2013–2015 (148 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 10 months.
Last raise 11.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round was 3.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 94% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 90% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Island Timberlands Finance Corp, Layne Christensen Co, Autotask Superior Holding, Inc., Creative Artists Agency Holdings LLC, Concord Resources Ltd.
Peoplefiled
15 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.