Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Green Earth Technologies Inc
Green Earth Technologies Inc looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Green Earth Technologies Inc operates in Other, based in CELEBRATION.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Green Earth Technologies Inc has raised $18M in disclosed capital across 12 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).
Largest single filing: $6.3M on 2011-12-12.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2011-12-12.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Green Earth Technologies Inc at approximately $95M (range $8.5M–$514M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.04× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2010–2012 (632 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (104% of peer median) for its niche.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 2 months.
Last raise 14.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round stepped up 1.1× from the prior — scaling.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 84% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 82% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Worldview Entertainment Capital Llc, Applied Merchant Systems West Coast, Inc., SWMF Life Science Venture Fund, Limited Partnership, PrimaLoft Holding Company, LLC, Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc..
Peoplefiled
17 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.