GMI-NOMA Refi, LP☆Watch⊞Compare

Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.

Procedural diagnosis est. — rule-based common-sense checks over the filing pattern, issuer name, activity cadence, and surfaced operating evidence.

GMI-NOMA Refi, LP behaves more like a recurring private-offering issuer than a conventional venture-backed operating company.

No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.

Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.

GMI-NOMA Refi, LP is one of 514 Lodging and Conventions companies tracked from IRVING. By capital raised it ranks among the largest (ahead of 93% of sector peers), and among the largest by modeled valuation est..

Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.

As reported in public records reported — not modeled.

Solid bars are reported offering amounts reported; hatched bars are the modeled post-money valuation est. — both on one shared scale so you can read raise-vs-worth at each round directly. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.

Round size and date are reported; the stage label is inferred from round size (latest is Series A — a $4.0M–$15M round). Valuation is modeled from stage benchmarks scaled by the lodging sector profile. Directional, not a quoted figure.

Benchmarked against 514 companies in Lodging and Conventions. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.

Raised more than 93% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 95% of peers (estimate).

A tighter cohort than the sector chart above — only companies at the same stage (Series A) that last raised in the same ~3-year era, ranked by modeled value est. (not money raised). This is the exact set the analyst read compares against, so a like-for-like cohort is what makes "over/under-valued" meaningful. This company ranks #2 of 19.

Stage is inferred from round size est., not reported on the filing — a round's dollar size maps to a bucket: Pre-Seed <$1.0M · Seed $1.0M–$4.0M · Series A $4.0M–$15M · Series B $15M–$40M · Series C $40M–$100M · Series D+ $100M–$400M · Growth/Late >$400M.

Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.

1. Series A$8.7M2020-11-02
   • First recorded raise — entered as Series A.
   • 132 investors on this round.
2. Series A$4.9M2020-11-02
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 1.8× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 65 investors on this round.
3. Series A$4.0M2020-11-02
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
   • 56 investors on this round.
4. Series A$7.3M2020-11-02
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 1.8× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • 109 investors on this round.
5. Series A$13.6M2020-11-02
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 1.9× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • 203 investors on this round.
6. Series A$7.8M2020-11-02
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 1.7× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 118 investors on this round.
7. Seed$2.4M2020-11-02
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 3.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 28 investors on this round.
8. Series A$13.0M2020-11-02
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 5.5× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • 192 investors on this round.
9. Series A$6.6M2020-11-02
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 2.0× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 98 investors on this round.
10. Series A$9.2M2020-11-02
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.4× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 139 investors on this round.
11. Series A$5.5M2020-11-02
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.7× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 78 investors on this round.
12. Series A$5.2M2020-11-02
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 69 investors on this round.
13. Seed$1.4M2020-11-02
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 3.6× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 15 investors on this round.
14. Pre-Seed$581K2020-11-02
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 2.5× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 6 investors on this round.

Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.

Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.

GMI-NOMA Refi, LP is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.

Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.

Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.

See where GMI-NOMA Refi, LP sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.

If you work at GMI-NOMA Refi, LP, claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.