Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Gi Alliance Holdings, Llc

Gi Alliance Holdings, Llc looks fair against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.

SourceRaising on rhythm with a 19.4× step-up on the last round — momentum worth tracking before it's priced in.

Businessfiled

Gi Alliance Holdings, Llc operates in Other, based in Southlake.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Gi Alliance Holdings, Llc has raised $541M in disclosed capital across 4 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).

Largest single filing: $490M on 2025-08-12.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2025-08-12.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Gi Alliance Holdings, Llc at approximately $4.9B (range $3.8B–$5.7B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.07× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Other companies in 2025–2027 (16 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (107% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 22 months.

Last raise 11 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.

The last round stepped up 19.4× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 99% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 99% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Einstein Topco, L.P., Einstein Aggregator, L.P., AE EventsCo Holdings LLC, United Sacrament Mobile Int. Inc., Apostolic Church of God-Childersburg.

Peoplefiled

23 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.