Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

GEE Group Inc.

GEE Group Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

GEE Group Inc. operates in Other, based in Jacksonville.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

GEE Group Inc. has raised $6.5M in disclosed capital across 4 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $2.0M on 2014-07-01.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2019-05-15.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models GEE Group Inc. at approximately $37M (range $1.8M–$292M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.33× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2019–2021 (1101 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (133% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 39 months.

Last raise 7.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 71% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 67% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Esperos, Inc., AL International Holdings Inc., Clean Beam, LLC, SEAM Group Holdings, LLC, HemTex Holdings, LLC.

Peoplefiled

22 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.