Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 1, 2026

FLYR, Inc.

FLYR, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

FLYR, Inc. operates in Other, based in SAN FRANCISCO.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

FLYR, Inc. has raised $132M in disclosed capital across 5 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series D+ (a $100M–$400M round).

Largest single filing: $105M on 2021-09-27.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-09-27.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models FLYR, Inc. at approximately $1.5B (range $597M–$2.9B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.70× the median modeled value of Series D+ Other companies in 2019–2021 (110 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (70% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 13 months.

Last raise 4.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 8.7× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 97% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 98% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Renascence Equity Ventures, Inc., Trulioo Information Services Inc., Diamond S Shipping Inc., BOA Holdings Inc., Maverick Parent L.P..

Peoplefiled

10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.