Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

FlightBridge, Inc.

FlightBridge, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

FlightBridge, Inc. operates in Other, based in ATLANTA.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

FlightBridge, Inc. has raised $1.4M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.4M on 2014-08-27.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-08-27.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models FlightBridge, Inc. at approximately $26M (range $1.2M–$200M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.78× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (78% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 11.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 42% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 59% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.