Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc.
Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc. operates in Manufacturing, based in ANAHEIM.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc. has raised $2.9B in disclosed capital across 20 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).
Largest single filing: $411M on 2011-09-15.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2012-09-18.
Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc. at approximately $1.2B (range $825M–$2.2B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.16× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Manufacturing companies in 2010–2012 (10 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 2 months.
Last raise 13.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round was 3.8× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 100% of Manufacturing peers (3257 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 97% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Michelin Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin /Fi, Colfax CORP, Chicago Bridge & Iron Co (Delaware), Sealed Air Corp/De, Dow Corning Corp.
Peoplefiled
24 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.
Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.