Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Fischer Watt Gold Co Inc

Fischer Watt Gold Co Inc looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Fischer Watt Gold Co Inc operates in Other, based in DENVER.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Fischer Watt Gold Co Inc has raised $667K in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $367K on 2010-03-26.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2012-08-31.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Fischer Watt Gold Co Inc at approximately $6.9M (range $200K–$79M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.92× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2010–2012 (1459 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (92% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 29 months.

Last raise 13.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 1.2× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 29% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 32% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Crown Rock Lenders, LLC, Lucas Venture Group V, LLC, Attitude Drinks Inc., Direct 2 Manufacturer, LLC, Suter Joshua Scott.

Peoplefiled

6 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.