Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

First Eagle Holdings, Inc.

First Eagle Holdings, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

First Eagle Holdings, Inc. operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

First Eagle Holdings, Inc. has raised $17M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $17M on 2017-06-30.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2017-06-30.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models First Eagle Holdings, Inc. at approximately $282M (range $42M–$1.1B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.85× the median modeled value of Series B Other companies in 2016–2018 (298 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (85% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 9.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 84% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 91% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: EIP Investment Holdings, LLC, HD MSouth Holdings, LLC, Aston Holding Corp., AirClean Holdings, Inc., Westminster Virginia LP.

Peoplefiled

15 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.