Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Firewall Holdings, Llc

Firewall Holdings, Llc looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Firewall Holdings, Llc operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Firewall Holdings, Llc has raised $46M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $46M on 2021-04-16.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-04-16.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Firewall Holdings, Llc at approximately $667M (range $176M–$1.6B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.82× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2019–2021 (190 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (82% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 5.2 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 92% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 95% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Lonnie Ray Williams Jr Trust, Ault Life Sciences, Inc., Watchtower Topco, LLC, Watchtower Management Holdco, LLC, Alphaeon 1 LLC.

Peoplefiled

11 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.