Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
FASETTO, Inc.
FASETTO, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
FASETTO, Inc. operates in Other, based in Scottsdale.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
FASETTO, Inc. has raised $51M in disclosed capital across 16 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).
Largest single filing: $14M on 2019-09-25.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-04-12.
Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models FASETTO, Inc. at approximately $4.9M (range $1.0M–$14M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.13× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2022–2024 (1135 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 3 months.
Last raise 3.2 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.
The last round stepped up 3.7× from the prior — scaling.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 93% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 25% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Ness Well, Inc., Quantori, Inc., Qquv Investments 5, Llc, Applause Network TV, Inc., Trustworthy Co.
Peoplefiled
17 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.
Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.