Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Exosome Diagnostics, Inc.

Exosome Diagnostics, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Exosome Diagnostics, Inc. operates in Biotechnology, based in Waltham.

Sub-sector tags: medical-devices.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Exosome Diagnostics, Inc. has raised $91M in disclosed capital across 6 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $30M on 2017-06-21.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2017-06-21.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Exosome Diagnostics, Inc. at approximately $1.2B (range $61M–$4.6B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.51× the median modeled value of Series B Biotechnology companies in 2016–2018 (101 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 11 months.

Last raise 9.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 14 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 2.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 89% of Biotechnology peers (4293 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 91% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Liquid BioScience, Inc., Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc., Tracon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tetra Discovery Partners, Inc., ECM Therapeutics, Inc..

Peoplefiled

16 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.