Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Erzo Functional Foods, LLC

Erzo Functional Foods, LLC looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Erzo Functional Foods, LLC operates in Other, based in BROOKLYN.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Erzo Functional Foods, LLC has raised $650K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $650K on 2015-09-23.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-09-23.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Erzo Functional Foods, LLC at approximately $15M (range $433K–$170M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.86× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (1650 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 10.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 29% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 47% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Waterblue IV LLC, Fairway America Fund VI, LLC, LoanTek, Inc., Roosevelt Way Investment, L.P., West Coast Customs Inc.

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.