EOS Surfaces L.L.C.☆Watch⊞Compare

Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.

Procedural diagnosis est. — rule-based common-sense checks over the filing pattern, issuer name, activity cadence, and surfaced operating evidence.

EOS Surfaces L.L.C. behaves more like a recurring private-offering issuer than a conventional venture-backed operating company.

No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.

Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.

EOS Surfaces L.L.C. is one of 3257 Manufacturing companies tracked from NORFOLK. By capital raised it ranks among the largest (ahead of 92% of sector peers), and mid-pack by modeled valuation est..

Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.

As reported in public records reported — not modeled.

This issuer has a dense recurring filing history, so the chart groups filings by year. Solid bars are annual reported capital reported; hatched bars show the latest modeled value est. observed in that year. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.

This looks like a recurring offering series, so a VC stage ladder would be misleading. Showing the filed offering sequence instead.

This issuer files recurring offerings, so the model treats stage labels as a loose sizing heuristic, not a clean VC ladder. The estimate anchors on reported filing amounts and dates, then applies benchmark dilution, survival, and markup assumptions. Directional, not a quoted figure.

Benchmarked against 3257 companies in Manufacturing. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.

Raised more than 92% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 65% of peers (estimate).

This issuer files too frequently for VC stage labels to be meaningful, so rows are shown as initial/follow-on offerings est. instead of Pre-Seed/Seed/Series buckets.

Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.

1. Initial offering$250K2012-01-30
   • First recorded raise — entered as Initial offering.
   • 3 investors on this round.
2. Follow-on offering$830K2012-04-30
   • Came back fast: 3 mo vs the ~12 mo sector norm.
   • Round 3.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • 10 investors on this round.
3. Follow-on offering$2.1M2012-07-01
   • Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~12 mo sector norm.
   • Round 2.5× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • 23 investors on this round.
4. Follow-on offering$405K2013-06-25
   • Raised 12 mo later, in step with the ~12 mo sector norm.
   • Round 5.2× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 5 investors on this round.
5. Follow-on offering$1.3M2013-07-01
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 3.1× larger than the prior — scaling up.
6. Follow-on offering$150K2013-07-16
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 8.4× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 2 investors on this round.
7. Follow-on offering$3.0M2014-07-01
   • Raised 11 mo later, in step with the ~12 mo sector norm.
   • Round 20.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 06).
8. Follow-on offering$4.0M2014-07-01
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 1.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
9. Follow-on offering$3.9M2014-10-21
   • Came back fast: 4 mo vs the ~12 mo sector norm.
   • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
   • 31 investors on this round.
10. Follow-on offering$20.7M2014-10-21
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 5.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 66 investors on this round.
11. Follow-on offering$22.6M2014-10-21
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 69 investors on this round.
12. Follow-on offering$14.9M2014-10-21
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.5× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 63 investors on this round.
13. Follow-on offering$34.1M2014-10-21
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 2.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 73 investors on this round.
14. Follow-on offering$5.0M2014-10-21
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 6.9× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 45 investors on this round.
15. Follow-on offering$7.5M2014-10-21
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.5× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 51 investors on this round.
16. Follow-on offering$9.9M2014-10-21
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 57 investors on this round.
17. Follow-on offering$15.9M2014-10-21
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.6× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 65 investors on this round.
18. Follow-on offering$30.3M2014-10-21
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.9× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 73 investors on this round.
19. Follow-on offering$24.8M2014-10-21
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 69 investors on this round.
20. Follow-on offering$2.0M2016-07-01
    • Raised again after 20 mo — slower than the ~12 mo sector norm.
    • Round 12.4× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.

Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.

Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.

EOS Surfaces L.L.C. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.

Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.

Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.

See where EOS Surfaces L.L.C. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.

If you work at EOS Surfaces L.L.C., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.