Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

ENCOUNTER COLLABORATIVE Corp

ENCOUNTER COLLABORATIVE Corp looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

ENCOUNTER COLLABORATIVE Corp operates in Other, based in PORTLAND.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

ENCOUNTER COLLABORATIVE Corp has raised $1.9M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.1M on 2013-03-01.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-04-17.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models ENCOUNTER COLLABORATIVE Corp at approximately $9.3M (range $450K–$73M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.29× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 7 months.

Last raise 12.2 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.6× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 48% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 37% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.

Peoplefiled

12 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.