Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Emboline Inc

Emboline Inc looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Emboline Inc operates in Other, based in SANTA CRUZ.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Emboline Inc has raised $67M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $55M on 2021-05-21.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-05-21.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Emboline Inc at approximately $795M (range $214M–$1.9B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.97× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2019–2021 (190 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (97% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 4 months.

Last raise 5.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 4.8× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 95% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 96% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Lonnie Ray Williams Jr Trust, Ault Life Sciences, Inc., Watchtower Topco, LLC, Watchtower Management Holdco, LLC, Alphaeon 1 LLC.

Peoplefiled

12 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.