Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

EIGHT TO GO Ltd LIABILITY Co

EIGHT TO GO Ltd LIABILITY Co looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

EIGHT TO GO Ltd LIABILITY Co operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

EIGHT TO GO Ltd LIABILITY Co has raised $15M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $7.5M on —.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-07-15.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models EIGHT TO GO Ltd LIABILITY Co at approximately $114M (range $10M–$617M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.28× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2013–2015 (623 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (128% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 522 months.

Last raise 13.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 82% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 84% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Biloxi Baseball, LLC, United Sample Inc, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., County Waste of Virginia, LLC, Marathon Patent Group, Inc..

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.