Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Diamond Age 3D, Inc.

Diamond Age 3D, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Diamond Age 3D, Inc. operates in Other, based in Pleasanton.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Diamond Age 3D, Inc. has raised $56M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $48M on 2022-03-08.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-03-08.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Diamond Age 3D, Inc. at approximately $584M (range $184M–$1.2B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.09× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2022–2024 (192 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (109% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 15 months.

Last raise 4.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 5.9× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 94% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 95% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Wild Type, Inc., Thingy Thing Inc., Intelycare, Inc., CertiK Global Ltd., Ivanhoe Electric Inc..

Peoplefiled

5 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.