Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Developing Zenzile LLC

Developing Zenzile LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Developing Zenzile LLC operates in Other, based in PRINCETON.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Developing Zenzile LLC has raised $525K in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $275K on 2020-11-24.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2020-11-24.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Developing Zenzile LLC at approximately $5.3M (range $183K–$54M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.86× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2019–2021 (1372 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (86% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 5.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 1.1× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 25% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 26% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Valued, Inc., CiiTA, LLC, Wnder, LTD, Supernova Discotheque, LLC, TommyKnockers LLC.

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.