Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 1, 2026

Datasphere Technologies Inc

Datasphere Technologies Inc looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Datasphere Technologies Inc operates in Other Technology, based in BELLEVUE.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Datasphere Technologies Inc has raised $21M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $11M on 2009-12-22.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2010-09-07.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Datasphere Technologies Inc at approximately $277M (range $13M–$1.5B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.78× the median modeled value of Series A Other Technology companies in 2010–2012 (618 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 9 months.

Last raise 15.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 1.1× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 84% of Other Technology peers (21292 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 87% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: G5 Search Marketing, Inc., Infineta Systems, Inc., Solera Networks Inc, Synos Technology, Inc., CouchSurfing International, Inc..

Peoplefiled

8 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.