Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Curious.com Inc

Curious.com Inc looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Curious.com Inc operates in Other, based in MENLO PARK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Curious.com Inc has raised $22M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $15M on 2013-11-22.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-11-22.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Curious.com Inc at approximately $249M (range $38M–$959M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.72× the median modeled value of Series B Other companies in 2013–2015 (273 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (72% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 19 months.

Last raise 12.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 2.1× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 87% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 90% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: PL Parent, LLC, ComplexCare Holdings, Inc., Sprinklr, Inc., Globaltranz Enterprises, Inc., Halco Acquisition Corp.

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.