Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

CreditCards.com, Inc.

CreditCards.com, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

CreditCards.com, Inc. operates in Other, based in AUSTIN.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

CreditCards.com, Inc. has raised $77M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $59M on 2009-12-31.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2009-12-31.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models CreditCards.com, Inc. at approximately $1.0B (range $227M–$2.7B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.03× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2007–2009 (34 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (103% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 6 months.

Last raise 16.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 3.2× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 95% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 97% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: DALTON JAPAN REAL ESTATE VALUE (OFFSHORE FEEDER) FUND Ltd., Dayton Superior Corp, Broder Bros., Co., Orica U.S. Services Inc., Specialized Education Holdings, Inc..

Peoplefiled

5 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.