Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Covestor Inc

Covestor Inc looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Covestor Inc operates in Other, based in BOSTON.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Covestor Inc has raised $381M in disclosed capital across 4 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series D+ (a $100M–$400M round).

Largest single filing: $360M on 2010-02-18.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-06-07.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Covestor Inc at approximately $225M (range $74M–$492M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.08× the median modeled value of Series D+ Other companies in 2013–2015 (90 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 13 months.

Last raise 13.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 3.3× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 99% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 90% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Campaign Monitor Holdings (UK) Ltd, Tomahawk Holdings, Inc., Cornell Capital Special Situations Partners II LP, Liberty Resources II, LLC, Resolute Investment Holdings, LLC.

Peoplefiled

12 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.