Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Coro Mining Corp

Coro Mining Corp looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Coro Mining Corp operates in Other, based in VANCOUVER.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Coro Mining Corp has raised $832K in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $426K on 2013-12-20.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-12-20.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Coro Mining Corp at approximately $9.9M (range $284K–$112M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.22× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (1650 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (122% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 12.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 1.1× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 33% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 38% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Produce P&A Fund, LLC, Tempus Applied Solutions Holdings, Inc., Music Labs, Inc., SAL Ethika Investments, LLC, Vyance, Inc..

Peoplefiled

9 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.