Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Conscious Content Media, Inc.

Conscious Content Media, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Conscious Content Media, Inc. operates in Media & Content, based in NEW YORK.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Conscious Content Media, Inc. has raised $146M in disclosed capital across 5 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $95M on 2022-12-30.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-12-30.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Conscious Content Media, Inc. at approximately $888M (range $329M–$1.7B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.68× the median modeled value of Series C Media & Content companies in 2022–2024 (9 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 25 months.

Last raise 3.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round stepped up 3.3× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 98% of Media & Content peers (1052 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 98% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: WonderView Studios, LLC, Nettwerk Music Group Inc., Troika Media Group, Inc., Entertainment Data Oracle, Inc., Lancelot Entertainment Investment Co., LLC.

Peoplefiled

14 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.