Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 1, 2026

Concierge Technologies Inc

Concierge Technologies Inc looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Concierge Technologies Inc operates in Software / Tech, based in VALLEY CENTER.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Concierge Technologies Inc has raised $89M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $86M on 2016-12-09.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2016-12-09.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Concierge Technologies Inc at approximately $2.7B (range $324M–$7.1B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.71× the median modeled value of Series C Software / Tech companies in 2016–2018 (22 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 22 months.

Last raise 9.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 28.5× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 95% of Software / Tech peers (3920 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 98% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Sauce Labs Inc, Peloton Technology, Inc., Liquidmetal Technologies Inc, Xirgo Technologies Intermediate Holdings, LLC, Helios & Matheson Analytics Inc..

Peoplefiled

4 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.