Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Concentric, Inc.

Concentric, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Concentric, Inc. operates in Other, based in CAMBRIDGE.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Concentric, Inc. has raised $2.3M in disclosed capital across 5 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $750K on 2019-02-22.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2019-02-22.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Concentric, Inc. at approximately $17M (range $500K–$197M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.79× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2019–2021 (1372 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 24 months.

Last raise 7.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.7× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 52% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 50% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Wnder, LTD, W.E. Equity Associates, LLC, Forest N Oak Holdings, Llc, RF SLIH Ltd LIABILITY Co, CiiTA, LLC.

Peoplefiled

8 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.