Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Conagra Foods Inc /De/

Conagra Foods Inc /De/ looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Conagra Foods Inc /De/ operates in Other, based in Omaha.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Conagra Foods Inc /De/ has raised $3.0B in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).

Largest single filing: $1.5B on —.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2012-02-03.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Conagra Foods Inc /De/ at approximately $26.6B (range $11.7B–$48.0B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.59× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Other companies in 2010–2012 (16 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 505 months.

Last raise 14.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 100% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 100% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Healthcare Technology Holdings, Inc., Chinos Holdings, Inc., Griffey Investors, L.P., Visteon Corp, Six Flags Entertainment Corp.

Peoplefiled

21 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.