Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Commodities Online LLC
Commodities Online LLC looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Commodities Online LLC operates in Other, based in FORT LAUDERDALE.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Commodities Online LLC has raised $26M in disclosed capital across 56 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).
Largest single filing: $2.2M on 2010-03-11.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2011-02-15.
Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Commodities Online LLC at approximately $10M (range $486K–$79M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.30× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2010–2012 (877 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 0 months.
Last raise 15.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round was 2.7× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 88% of Other peers (25008 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 38% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Watermill-MPI Partners, L.P., Right Residential, LLC Series 3, Aquantis, Inc., Yellow Line Productions, LLC, ClickFuel, Inc..
Peoplefiled
4 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.
Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.