Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Coinstar Inc

Coinstar Inc looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Coinstar Inc operates in Other, based in BELLEVUE.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Coinstar Inc has raised $46M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $42M on 2009-02-26.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2009-02-26.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Coinstar Inc at approximately $714M (range $161M–$1.9B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.73× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2007–2009 (34 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (73% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 17.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 10.3× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 92% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 95% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: DALTON JAPAN REAL ESTATE VALUE (OFFSHORE FEEDER) FUND Ltd., Dayton Superior Corp, Broder Bros., Co., Orica U.S. Services Inc., Specialized Education Holdings, Inc..

Peoplefiled

10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.