Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Cocoon Holdings, LLC

Cocoon Holdings, LLC looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Cocoon Holdings, LLC operates in Other, based in GREEN BAY, CA, USA. Bring your most important groups closer together

Sub-sector tags: Collaboration, Team Collaboration.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Cocoon Holdings, LLC has raised $550K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $550K on 2020-08-19.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2020-08-19.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Cocoon Holdings, LLC at approximately $12M (range $367K–$131M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.93× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2019–2021 (1372 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports no revenue, yet is modeled well above niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 5.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 26% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 42% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Valued, Inc., CiiTA, LLC, Wnder, LTD, Supernova Discotheque, LLC, TommyKnockers LLC.

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.