Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Chlorum Solutions Llc

Chlorum Solutions Llc looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Chlorum Solutions Llc operates in Other, based in CHICAGO.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Chlorum Solutions Llc has raised $40M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $40M on 2020-09-15.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2020-09-15.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Chlorum Solutions Llc at approximately $627M (range $99M–$2.3B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.10× the median modeled value of Series B Other companies in 2019–2021 (371 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 5.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 91% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 95% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: MStar Holding Corp, IFS Management Holdco, LLC, Benefit Recovery Group, LLC, Shenandoah Growers, Inc., Zmco Llc.

Peoplefiled

4 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.