Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Chicago Football Club P.B.C.

Chicago Football Club P.B.C. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is quiet on financing cadence.

SourceModeled below same-niche peers while still financing on rhythm — a potential mispricing worth a closer look.

Businessfiled

Chicago Football Club P.B.C. operates in Other, based in Hoboken.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Chicago Football Club P.B.C. has raised $4.0M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $3.0M on 2023-10-11.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2025-03-03.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Chicago Football Club P.B.C. at approximately $3.3M (range $900K–$7.3M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.64× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2025–2027 (516 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports $0–$1M revenue while modeled below niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 17 months.

Last raise 16 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Slightly overdue versus sector cadence.

The last round was 3.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 62% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 18% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Council Senior BTR Investors, LLC, Infineo Global, LP, SRE Venture 724, LLC, Bernadette De Lourdes Development Llc, Keep Moving Inc..

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.