Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Charity Partners Inc.

Charity Partners Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Charity Partners Inc. operates in Other, based in Boston.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Charity Partners Inc. has raised $20M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $12M on 2010-11-29.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2010-11-29.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Charity Partners Inc. at approximately $179M (range $16M–$972M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.97× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2010–2012 (632 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 37 months.

Last raise 15.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.5× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 85% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 88% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Worldview Entertainment Capital Llc, Applied Merchant Systems West Coast, Inc., SWMF Life Science Venture Fund, Limited Partnership, PrimaLoft Holding Company, LLC, Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc..

Peoplefiled

18 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.