Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Challenger Deep Resources Corp.

Challenger Deep Resources Corp. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Challenger Deep Resources Corp. operates in Other, based in CALGARY.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Challenger Deep Resources Corp. has raised $2.7M in disclosed capital across 4 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.6M on 2011-02-28.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-06-11.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Challenger Deep Resources Corp. at approximately $11M (range $540K–$88M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.34× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 18 months.

Last raise 11.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 4.1× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 55% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 40% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.

Peoplefiled

19 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.