Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

CG Acquisitions, Inc.

CG Acquisitions, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

CG Acquisitions, Inc. operates in Other, based in San Mateo.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

CG Acquisitions, Inc. has raised $48M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $48M on 2015-03-02.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-03-02.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models CG Acquisitions, Inc. at approximately $821M (range $185M–$2.2B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.96× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2013–2015 (148 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (96% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 11.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 93% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 96% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Island Timberlands Finance Corp, Layne Christensen Co, Autotask Superior Holding, Inc., Creative Artists Agency Holdings LLC, Concord Resources Ltd.

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.