Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Cerro de Pasco Resources Inc.

Cerro de Pasco Resources Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.

Diligence furtherNo decisive signal either way from the public record alone — the call needs primary diligence beyond the filings.

Businessfiled

Cerro de Pasco Resources Inc. operates in Other, based in SAINT-SAUVEUR.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Cerro de Pasco Resources Inc. has raised $3.7M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.9M on 2025-11-07.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2025-11-07.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Cerro de Pasco Resources Inc. at approximately $4.8M (range $1.7M–$8.9M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.93× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2025–2027 (516 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (93% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 11 months.

Last raise 8 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.

The last round stepped up 1.1× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 60% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 25% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Council Senior BTR Investors, LLC, Infineo Global, LP, SRE Venture 724, LLC, Bernadette De Lourdes Development Llc, Keep Moving Inc..

Peoplefiled

11 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.