Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

CB World Management LLC

CB World Management LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is quiet on financing cadence.

Diligence furtherNo decisive signal either way from the public record alone — the call needs primary diligence beyond the filings.

Businessfiled

CB World Management LLC operates in Other, based in ISELIN.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

CB World Management LLC has raised $58M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $39M on 2022-05-03.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2024-11-01.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models CB World Management LLC at approximately $108M (range $48M–$182M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.69× the median modeled value of Series B Other companies in 2022–2024 (465 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (69% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 30 months.

Last raise 20 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Slightly overdue versus sector cadence.

The last round was 2.1× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 94% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 84% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Ever/Body, Inc., Financeware Holdings LLC, American Cricket Enterprises Inc., Xlerate Ultimate Holdings, Lp, MDME Ultimate Holdings, LP.

Peoplefiled

10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.