Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Campaign Monitor Holdings (UK) Ltd

Campaign Monitor Holdings (UK) Ltd looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Campaign Monitor Holdings (UK) Ltd operates in Other, based in LONDON.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Campaign Monitor Holdings (UK) Ltd has raised $801M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series D+ (a $100M–$400M round).

Largest single filing: $399M on 2015-03-31.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-03-31.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Campaign Monitor Holdings (UK) Ltd at approximately $6.9B (range $2.3B–$15.1B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.50× the median modeled value of Series D+ Other companies in 2013–2015 (90 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 11.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 106.7× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 100% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 100% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Tomahawk Holdings, Inc., Cornell Capital Special Situations Partners II LP, Liberty Resources II, LLC, Resolute Investment Holdings, LLC, THL Portfolio Holdings Corp..

Peoplefiled

20 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.