Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Brooklyn Dumpling Parent Holdings, Inc.

Brooklyn Dumpling Parent Holdings, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.

SourceModeled below same-niche peers while still financing on rhythm — a potential mispricing worth a closer look.

Businessfiled

Brooklyn Dumpling Parent Holdings, Inc. operates in Other, based in HACKENSACK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Brooklyn Dumpling Parent Holdings, Inc. has raised $4.3M in disclosed capital across 13 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.1M on 2023-11-14.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2026-03-06.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Brooklyn Dumpling Parent Holdings, Inc. at approximately $226K (range $90K–$381K). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.04× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2025–2027 (516 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 2 months.

Last raise 4 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.

The last round was 2.1× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 63% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 0% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Council Senior BTR Investors, LLC, Infineo Global, LP, SRE Venture 724, LLC, Bernadette De Lourdes Development Llc, Keep Moving Inc..

Peoplefiled

11 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.