Companies · Other Technology

Bramasol, Inc.

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO · Other Technology

Diligence memoA one-page analyst read on Bramasol, Inc. — recommendation, valuation, rhythm, risks.
$15.7M
Total raised · real
21
Rounds
2.0×
Latest step-up
Top 21%
Sector rank · raised
Recurring offerings
Latest stage · inferred · Tue Dec 31 2013 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

Bramasol, Inc. has raised $16M over 21 rounds; too few niche peers to rank its valuation yet.

Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page. Valuation uses the technology sector profile.

Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.

Program ended
  • Last raise 12.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.
  • For a recurring offering issuer, long silence usually means the offering program is inactive or ended; it is not proof the legal entity is defunct.

Procedural diagnosis est. — rule-based common-sense checks over the filing pattern, issuer name, activity cadence, and surfaced operating evidence.

Recurring offering issuermedium confidence

Bramasol, Inc. behaves more like a recurring private-offering issuer than a conventional venture-backed operating company.

Issuer structure
Program-like
Frequent filings and follow-ons read more like a securities offering program than discrete startup rounds.
Lifecycle
17.1 yr record
Peak capital year was 2013 with $6.0M across 4 filings.
Market position
ahead of 80% of Other Technology peers
Capital scale is ahead of 80% of Other Technology peers; modeled value is above 63% of peers by modeled value. Large capital with mid-pack modeled value can signal an issuer/program profile rather than operating-company growth.
Valuation reliability
Lower applicability
Stage/dilution valuation models are weakest when the issuer is broad-sector, recurring, or vehicle-like.
Operating evidence
Sparse
No clear CEO/founder/principal role is surfaced, so operating-company confidence is lower.
Data quality
Consistent
Canonical totals and visible filing detail are broadly aligned.
What triggered this
  • 21 dated financing filings, averaging about 3 months apart.
  • No clearly named CEO/founder/principal role in the public records surfaced here.
  • No verified homepage on the profile yet.
  • Capital program peaked in 2013: $6.0M across 4 filings.
  • Largest single filing was $2.0M on 2013-12-31.
How to read the page
  • Read this less like a startup funding journey and more like a capital-raising program.
  • Stage-based valuation and peer labels have lower applicability for this pattern.
  • The more important signal is lifecycle: repeated filings ended years ago, so current activity needs outside confirmation.
Leadership

No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.

Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.

Where it sits in Other Technology

Bramasol, Inc. is one of 21292 Other Technology companies tracked from SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. By capital raised it ranks in the upper tier (ahead of 80% of sector peers), and mid-pack by modeled valuation est..

Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.

As reported in public records reported — not modeled.

US
Jurisdiction
Amount raised vs valuation, by year

This issuer has a dense recurring filing history, so the chart groups filings by year. Solid bars are annual reported capital reported; hatched bars show the latest modeled value est. observed in that year. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.

Annual capital raised · realLatest value in year · estCumulative funded · real

Dense history compressed: 21 filings shown as 5 yearly buckets. Hover a bucket for filing count, annual capital, and latest modeled value.

$0$25M$50M$75M$100M2009: 5 filings Raised $1.6M total (real) Latest modeled valuation $15M (est)20095 filings2010: 5 filings Raised $1.8M total (real) Latest modeled valuation $13M (est)20105 filings2011: 3 filings Raised $1.2M total (real) Latest modeled valuation $15M (est)20113 filings2012: 4 filings Raised $5.1M total (real) Latest modeled valuation $34M (est)20124 filings2013: 4 filings Raised $6.0M total (real) Latest modeled valuation $68M (est)20134 filings+$1.8M+$1.2M+$5.1M+$6.0MCumulative $16M

The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.

Financing ladder & sequence gaps

This looks like a recurring offering series, so a VC stage ladder would be misleading. Showing the filed offering sequence instead.

Initial offering$250K · 2009
Follow-on offering$250K · 2009
Follow-on offering$250K · 2009
Follow-on offering$500K · 2009
Follow-on offering$350K · 2009
Follow-on offering$150K · 2010
Follow-on offering$400K · 2010
Follow-on offering$550K · 2010
Follow-on offering$350K · 2010
Follow-on offering$300K · 2010
Follow-on offering$375K · 2011
Follow-on offering$500K · 2011
Follow-on offering$350K · 2011
Follow-on offering$1.0M · 2012
Follow-on offering$1.2M · 2012
Follow-on offering$1.9M · 2012
Follow-on offering$1.0M · 2012
Follow-on offering$1.5M · 2013
Follow-on offering$1.5M · 2013
Follow-on offering$1000K · 2013
Follow-on offering$2.0M · 2013
Modeled valuation trajectory
$68.1M
Base estimate est.
$1.8M
Conservative case
$534.7M
Upside case
$10.0M
Modeled post-money

This issuer files recurring offerings, so the model treats stage labels as a loose sizing heuristic, not a clean VC ladder. The estimate anchors on reported filing amounts and dates, then applies benchmark dilution, survival, and markup assumptions. Directional, not a quoted figure.

Pre-Seed · modeled $10.6M · 2009-05-142009Pre-Seed · modeled $10.6M · 2009-06-03Pre-Seed · modeled $10.6M · 2009-07-21Pre-Seed · modeled $21.2M · 2009-09-04Pre-Seed · modeled $14.8M · 2009-11-30Pre-Seed · modeled $6.4M · 2010-02-22Pre-Seed · modeled $16.9M · 2010-05-26Pre-Seed · modeled $23.3M · 2010-07-12Pre-Seed · modeled $14.8M · 2010-10-13Pre-Seed · modeled $12.7M · 2010-12-22Pre-Seed · modeled $15.9M · 2011-05-03Pre-Seed · modeled $21.2M · 2011-07-15Pre-Seed · modeled $14.8M · 2011-10-31Pre-Seed · modeled $42.4M · 2012-02-23Seed · modeled $40.9M · 2012-06-14Seed · modeled $65.6M · 2012-07-25Seed · modeled $34.1M · 2012-10-30Seed · modeled $51.1M · 2013-02-21Seed · modeled $51.1M · 2013-05-01Seed · modeled $34.1M · 2013-09-03Seed · modeled $68.1M · 2013-12-312013
Model inputs · modeled:benchmark-stage-stepup-v1
20%
Dilution assumption
Implied ownership sold in the financing.
39%
Survival probability
18% low · 61% high
1.61×/yr
Annual markup
2.11×/yr upside case
6.0 yr
Elapsed time used
12.5 yr actual, capped for stale marks
technology
Sector profile
Adjusts growth and survival by industry.
Financing rhythm
3 mo
Avg between rounds
$3.4M/yr
Capital velocity
17.1 yr
On record since
2009
First round
21
Rounds on file
How it compares to the market

Benchmarked against 21292 companies in Other Technology. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.

Total raised — vs sector median (real $, all stages) 4.9× above median
This company$15.7M
Sector median$3.2M
Modeled value — vs sector median (estimate, all stages) 1.8× above median
This company$68.1M
Sector median$37.3M

Raised more than 80% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 63% of peers (estimate).

Full financing history

This issuer files too frequently for VC stage labels to be meaningful, so rows are shown as initial/follow-on offerings est. instead of Pre-Seed/Seed/Series buckets.

StageAmount · realAnnouncedPost-money · estValue · estConf.
Initial offering$250K2009-05-14$1.4M$10.6M90%
Follow-on offering$250K2009-06-03$1.4M$10.6M90%
Follow-on offering$250K2009-07-21$1.4M$10.6M90%
Follow-on offering$500K2009-09-04$2.8M$21.2M90%
Follow-on offering$350K2009-11-30$1.9M$14.8M90%
Follow-on offering$150K2010-02-22$833K$6.4M90%
Follow-on offering$400K2010-05-26$2.2M$16.9M90%
Follow-on offering$550K2010-07-12$3.1M$23.3M90%
Follow-on offering$350K2010-10-13$1.9M$14.8M90%
Follow-on offering$300K2010-12-22$1.7M$12.7M90%
Follow-on offering$375K2011-05-03$2.1M$15.9M90%
Follow-on offering$500K2011-07-15$2.8M$21.2M90%
Follow-on offering$350K2011-10-31$1.9M$14.8M90%
Follow-on offering$1.0M2012-02-23$5.6M$42.4M90%
Follow-on offering$1.2M2012-06-14$6.0M$40.9M90%
Follow-on offering$1.9M2012-07-25$9.6M$65.6M90%
Follow-on offering$1.0M2012-10-30$5.0M$34.1M90%
Follow-on offering$1.5M2013-02-21$7.5M$51.1M90%
Follow-on offering$1.5M2013-05-01$7.5M$51.1M90%
Follow-on offering$1000K2013-09-03$5.0M$34.1M90%
Follow-on offering$2.0M2013-12-31$10.0M$68.1M90%
What happened at each round

Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.

  1. Initial offering$250K2009-05-14
    • First recorded raise — entered as Initial offering.
  2. Follow-on offering$250K2009-06-03
    • Came back fast: 1 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
  3. Follow-on offering$250K2009-07-21
    • Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
  4. Follow-on offering$500K2009-09-04
    • Came back fast: 1 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 2.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
  5. Follow-on offering$350K2009-11-30
    • Came back fast: 3 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.4× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
  6. Follow-on offering$150K2010-02-22
    • Came back fast: 3 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 2.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
  7. Follow-on offering$400K2010-05-26
    • Came back fast: 3 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 2.7× larger than the prior — scaling up.
  8. Follow-on offering$550K2010-07-12
    • Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.4× larger than the prior — scaling up.
  9. Follow-on offering$350K2010-10-13
    • Came back fast: 3 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.6× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
  10. Follow-on offering$300K2010-12-22
    • Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
  11. Follow-on offering$375K2011-05-03
    • Came back fast: 4 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
  12. Follow-on offering$500K2011-07-15
    • Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
  13. Follow-on offering$350K2011-10-31
    • Came back fast: 4 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.4× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
  14. Follow-on offering$1.0M2012-02-23
    • Came back fast: 4 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 2.9× larger than the prior — scaling up.
  15. Follow-on offering$1.2M2012-06-14
    • Came back fast: 4 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
  16. Follow-on offering$1.9M2012-07-25
    • Came back fast: 1 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.6× larger than the prior — scaling up.
  17. Follow-on offering$1.0M2012-10-30
    • Came back fast: 3 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.9× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
  18. Follow-on offering$1.5M2013-02-21
    • Came back fast: 4 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.5× larger than the prior — scaling up.
  19. Follow-on offering$1.5M2013-05-01
    • Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
  20. Follow-on offering$1000K2013-09-03
    • Came back fast: 4 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.5× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
  21. Follow-on offering$2.0M2013-12-31
    • Came back fast: 4 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 2.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
Intelligence
2014 ~Q1
Modeled next raise · ~3mo cadence
$4.0M
Modeled next size est.range $2.6M$6.4M
2.0×
Last step-up
$3.4M/yr
Capital velocity

Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.

Key people & operators

Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.

PersonRoleAlso runsTied since
Jonathan Bell2 other2009-05
Rouven Westphal1 other2013-09
David Fellers2011-05
Hasso Plattner2012-10
Louise De Putron2009-05
Louise Du Putron2009-11
Peter Mauel2009-05
Ronn Loewenthal2009-05
Registry & provenance

Bramasol, Inc. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.

United States
Country of record
US
Jurisdiction
1303559
SEC CIK
Similar companies

Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.

CompanySectorStageRaised · realValue · estWhy similar
Highroads IncOther TechnologySeed$12.6M$68.1Msame sector · same stage
FibeRio Technology CorpOther TechnologySeed$11.3M$68.9Msame sector · same stage
Shoutz, Inc.Other TechnologySeed$11.0M$68.1Msame sector · same stage
Lightwave Logic, Inc.Other TechnologySeed$10.2M$68.1Msame sector · same stage
Mimvi, Inc.Other TechnologySeed$9.6M$68.1Msame sector · same stage
entegra technologies inc.Other TechnologySeed$9.5M$68.1Msame sector · same stage
Standing Cloud IncOther TechnologySeed$9.0M$68.1Msame sector · same stage
Schoox, Inc.Other TechnologySeed$8.5M$68.1Msame sector · same stage
Frequently asked
How much funding has Bramasol, Inc. raised?
Bramasol, Inc. has raised approximately $15.7M in disclosed capital across 21 recorded financing rounds, aggregated from public filings.
What is Bramasol, Inc.'s estimated valuation?
Provath's modeled valuation for Bramasol, Inc. is approximately $68.1M (modeled range $1.8M–$534.7M). This is an algorithmic estimate derived from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
What funding stage is Bramasol, Inc. at?
Bramasol, Inc. shows a recurring offering pattern rather than a clean VC stage progression. Its most recent recorded round closed around Tue Dec 31.
What does Bramasol, Inc. do and where is it based?
Bramasol, Inc. operates in the Other Technology sector, based in SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO.
Explore related

See where Bramasol, Inc. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.

Is this your company?

If you work at Bramasol, Inc., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.

Is this your company? Update your profile or add contact details — and choose exactly who can reach you. Reviewed before anything is published.